San Francisco, USA – The tech world is buzzing after a shocking statement from Replit CEO Amjad Masad, who boldly declared that learning to code is a “waste of time” in the age of AI. His controversial take has ignited fierce debates among programmers, educators, and tech enthusiasts worldwide.
Why Would a Coding Platform CEO Say This?
Masad, whose own company, Replit, helps developers build apps and websites using AI, dropped this bombshell in a recent tweet:
“I no longer think you should learn to code.”
But why would the CEO of a coding platform say such a thing? And is he right? Let’s break it down.
AI Will Write 90% of Code Soon – Are Human Coders Doomed?
Masad’s argument hinges on a striking prediction from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who believes AI could generate up to 90% of all code within just six months.
“In the future, all code will be AI-generated,” Masad said. “Agents are getting better and better. At this point, learning to code might not be worth your time.”
This isn’t just speculation—AI is already transforming coding:
- Google CEO Sundar Pichai recently admitted that 25% of new code at Google is AI-generated (then reviewed by engineers).
- OpenAI’s Sam Altman claims AI handles over 50% of coding tasks in many companies.
- GitHub Copilot, an AI coding assistant, is used by millions of developers to speed up their work.
So, is coding as a career dead?
Forget Coding – Focus on THIS Instead
Masad isn’t saying tech skills are useless—just that the game has changed. Instead of memorizing syntax, he argues people should focus on:
- Problem-solving – Breaking down complex challenges.
- Creativity – Designing solutions, not just writing lines of code.
- Communication – Explaining ideas clearly to both humans and AI.
“Learn how to think, learn how to break down problems,” he advises. “Coding is just a tool—the real skill is knowing what to build.”
Programmers Fight Back: “You’re Wrong!”
Unsurprisingly, Masad’s take has sparked heated backlash. Many argue that you can’t master problem-solving without coding first.
One developer fired back:
“Learning to code is HOW you learn problem-solving. There’s no shortcut!”
Another added:
“AI still makes mistakes. If you don’t understand code, how will you fix it?”
Even legendary programmer John Carmack (creator of Doom) has warned against over-relying on AI, saying:
“You still need to deeply understand systems to build great things.”
The Bigger Question: Will AI Steal ALL Tech Jobs?
This isn’t just about coding—it’s about the future of work. AI is already:
- Writing marketing emails (ChatGPT)
- Creating legal documents (Harvey AI)
- Designing graphics (Midjourney)
- Even diagnosing diseases (IBM Watson)
So, if AI takes over coding, what’s left for humans?
The Verdict: Should You Still Learn to Code?
The truth? It depends.
- If you want to be a cutting-edge developer, you’ll still need coding skills—but AI will be your co-pilot, not your replacement.
- If you’re a non-technical professional, learning basic coding (like Python) can still help you automate tasks and work smarter.
- If you’re a student, focus on logic, creativity, and adaptability—because AI changes fast.
Final Thought
Masad’s take is controversial, but it forces us to ask: What skills will matter most in 5 years? One thing’s clear—the future belongs to those who can think, not just type.
What do YOU think? Is coding still worth learning, or is AI making it obsolete? Let us know in the comments!
Login with Google